Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and affiliates (“Skadden”) handles some of the most challenging, high-stakes securities litigation matters — “bet-the-company” cases that demand a full range of skills, in and out of the courtroom, as well as deep experience with often-overlapping internal investigations, derivative actions and investigations by the SEC and other federal or state regulators. The outcome of these proceedings can be vital to a company’s future, and Skadden’s approach of assembling collaborative teams of advisers with deep and relevant experience across our worldwide platform and the full range of disciplines is key to our successful track record on behalf of clients.
We have been selected as lead defense counsel in several of the largest and most important securities class actions in U.S. history, including representing Alcatel, Cendant Corporation, DaimlerChrysler AG, McKesson Corporation, Sunbeam Corporation, Waste Management, Inc. and the underwriters in the WorldCom bondholder litigation, among others. Skadden has successfully represented clients in significant and precedent-setting cases in appellate courts and before the U.S. Supreme Court, including Merrill Lynch in a unanimous win in Merrill Lynch v. Dabit. We also represented Merrill Lynch in securing two major victories before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. This includes Lentell v. Merrill Lynch, in which the Second Circuit adopted a standard for loss causation that has been cited hundreds of times; and Wilson v. Merrill Lynch, which was the first auction rate securities (ARS) class action arising from the market collapse to be decided by an appellate court.
Our work includes representing financial institutions in matters related to subprime loans and the credit crisis, such as mortgage-backed securities litigation, securities class and derivative actions, and ERISA-related litigation. We also are representing clients in numerous cases related to the foreign exchange/commodities industries, addressing issues pertaining to foreign exchange rates, market manipulation and price-fixing allegations. Additionally, we handle the broad range of issues that arise when any corporation, director or officer faces securities, class or derivative-related claims.
Skadden plays an active role in addressing and resolving litigation claims in the M&A context. In the last several years, our attorneys have defeated challenges to hundreds of billions of dollars in deals, in cases filed in Delaware and across the United States.
We advise on a wide variety of securities-related regulatory matters at the federal and state levels, and provide assistance in connection with investigations and proceedings before the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Department of Justice, the offices of various state attorneys general, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the New York Stock Exchange. We also have advised boards of directors and special committees in investigations of shareholder demands, accounting issues and other corporate governance matters. Many of our attorneys have valuable knowledge and experience from previous government service with the DOJ, SEC and CFTC.
Our Securities Litigation Group, which has received many top rankings and recognitions, was:
- selected by The American Lawyer as a finalist in its 2014 Litigation Department of the Year issue.
- for the third consecutive time named a member of the “Fearsome Foursome” — the four elite law firm litigation practices — and named as one of only three “powerhouses” for Securities and Finance Litigation in a survey of corporate counsel conducted by BTI Consulting and published by Law360 in 2013. We also were named as one of Law360’s Securities Groups of 2013.
- recognized for our defense of UniCredit S.p.A. in Madoff-related litigation in the 2013 Financial Times’ U.S. “Innovative Lawyers” report, which ranked Skadden first overall.
- ranked in the top tier for securities litigation by U.S. News — Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms” 2014.
- ranked in the top tier in securities litigation in Chambers USA 2013 and the U.S. Legal 500 2013. According to Chambers, “The team … has played a prominent role in the defense of securities claims for some of the most significant corporations and financial institutions.” Legal 500 said Skadden is “the top choice for ‘make or break’ litigation.”
We handle securities, derivative and deal-related litigation matters for clients in a wide range of industries. Recent representations include:
Banks and Financial Institutions
- Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, UBS, Royal Bank of Scotland, Société Générale, CIBC, Crédit Agricole and BNP Paribas, among others, in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and other securities cases brought in state and federal courts and FINRA arbitrations throughout the country arising out of the credit crisis.
- Bank of America in the dismissal of claims that it aided and abetted fraud by providing a line of credit to Herbalife.
- Bank of America in the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by a Florida investor alleging common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation concerning its acquisition of Merrill Lynch.
- Bank of America Corporation and certain of its affiliates in the first two civil cases brought by the federal-state RMBS Working Group involving the issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities: the first involving claims against the bank pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 for alleged misrepresentations in connection with a single RMBS transaction, and the second involving claims against the bank for alleged wrongdoing in connection with the same RMBS transaction.
- Bank of America, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and several former Merrill Lynch officers and directors in an affirmance of the dismissal of two double-derivative suits that sought to compel the BofA board to force its Merrill subsidiary to bring various claims against certain of Merrill’s former officers and directors in connection with Merrill’s allegedly risky investments in collateralized debt obligations.
- Barclays Bank in a FERC investigation regarding alleged market manipulation involving power trading in the western United States during late 2006 through 2008 and related federal court litigation.
- Citigroup Inc. in securing the dismissal with prejudice of a shareholder class action arising out of a nearly $600 million transaction relating to Citi’s subsidiary, Student Loan Corporation.
- J.P. Morgan Chase in the dismissal of a federal class action brought by the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System alleging that J.P. Morgan Chase failed to provide the “prevailing” rate on foreign exchange transactions executed through its AutoFX program.
- Morgan Stanley Private Equity Asia III Holdings in securing a denial for preliminary injunction in a class action challenging a going-private transaction involving Feihe International.
- Royal Bank of Scotland Group in the dismissal of a federal action brought by Woori Bank alleging false and misleading misrepresentations and omissions in connection with $120 million in collateralized debt obligations.
- UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico, UBS Trust Company of Puerto Rico and directors of a group of mutual funds in the dismissal of remanded shareholder derivative claims in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico alleging violations of federal securities and Puerto Rico laws. Prior to this, Skadden was successful in obtaining a grant of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve a circuit court split over the standard of review for appeals of dismissals pursuant to Rule 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
numerous major financial institutions in underwriting syndicates in:
- obtaining the dismissal with prejudice of a federal class action alleging that Deutsche Bank failed to adequately disclose its exposure to subprime and other residential mortgage-backed securities; and
- successful opposition of a motion in federal court seeking to file a second amended complaint in a federal securities class action brought on behalf of purchasers of certain securities issued by Bank of America Corporation.
- UniCredit, Pioneer Alternative Investments, Tremont Group Holdings and others in more than 25 actions stemming from the Bernard Madoff scandal, including litigation in federal trial and appellate courts in New York; state court actions in New York, California, Delaware, Massachusetts, Florida, Colorado, New Mexico and Washington; and, most notably, securing the dismissal of $60 billion in trebled RICO claims and common law claims brought against UniCredit by Irving Picard, the trustee for the Securities Investor Protection Act liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities.
- Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in the dismissal of all but one alleged misstatement relating to the company’s investment and liability exposure for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
- Exelon Corporation in the dismissal of a class action brought by shareholders of Constellation Energy Group in connection with its $7.9 billion merger with Exelon.
- GenOn Energy in litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery and Texas state and federal courts arising out of the $1.7 billion stock-for-stock merger between GenOn and NRG Energy.
Health Care, Life Sciences and Pharmaceuticals
- Amerigroup Corporation in successfully settling shareholder litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking to enjoin its proposed $4.9 billion acquisition by WellPoint.
- Express Scripts in the settlement of a federal class action brought by shareholders of Medco Health Solutions related to Express Scripts’ acquisition of Medco. Skadden also obtained a dismissal of antitrust claims brought in Pennsylvania federal court.
- Pfizer Inc. and its CEO in shareholder derivative litigation relating to FCPA issues at certain Pfizer subsidiaries.
- Stryker Corporation in federal and state class actions in connection with Stryker’s tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Orthovita involving allegations that Orthovita’s directors breached their fiduciary duties.
- the independent directors of Inland American Real Estate Investment Trust in the dismissal with prejudice of a class action that challenged the value of shares sold to investors through a distribution reinvestment plan.
- the board of directors of Kid Brands in securing the affirmance by the Third Circuit of the dismissal of a shareholder class action alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act in connection with customs compliance violations by the company’s subsidiaries, and in a related shareholder derivative action that was dismissed entirely.
- BlackBerry (f/k/a Research in Motion Limited (RIM)) and certain of its officers in the dismissal with prejudice of a securities class action alleging that RIM made materially false and misleading statements regarding its financial condition and business prospects. The case is currently on appeal in the Second Circuit.
- current and former members of the board of directors of Hewlett-Packard Company in securing dismissals in two separate shareholder derivative actions that arose from the highly publicized departure of HP’s one-time CEO Mark Hurd and HP’s acquisition of 3PAR.
- Computer Sciences Corp. and certain of its directors in the settlement of a federal securities class action complaint and dismissal of a related derivative litigation challenging certain statements related to the company’s performance of its agreement with the U.K. National Health Service to computerize the medical records for all U.K. residents in the areas covered by the agreement.
- Travelzoo Inc. and certain of its officers in securing the dismissal of a securities class action lawsuit brought challenging certain statements related to the company’s growth and its Getaways business. We also secured the dismissal of all claims against Travelzoo Inc. and certain of its directors in two separate derivative actions alleging breaches of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment.
Transportation & Automotive
- Autoliv in a securities class action involving alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.