The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the $11.5 million verdict in Ollnova Technologies Ltd. v. Ecobee Technologies ULC and sent the case back to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas for a new trial. Skadden partner Bijal V. Vakil discusses how the decision confirms that infringement questions on a verdict form must be separated by patent, not combined into a single “any patent” question, and sends an important message on patent subject matter eligibility: If a jury is asked to decide an Alice issue, it must be told what abstract idea the court has identified and that the abstract idea itself cannot be the inventive concept.
Fed. Circ.'s Thermostat Ruling Holds Patent Jury Trial Lessons
Law360