Mass Torts, Insurance and Consumer Litigation

The Mass Torts, Insurance and Consumer Litigation Group at Skadden has been involved in many of the significant complex tort and consumer fraud litigations of the last 30 years, many of which are considered “bet-the-company” matters. The group pioneered the “national counsel” model of handling mass tort litigation and has strong relationships with local defense lawyers in virtually every state. We handle some of the most noteworthy cases nationwide for clients such as Altria, Anheuser-Busch, Bausch & Lomb, Electrolux, Intuitive Surgical, Johnson & Johnson, Lincoln Electric, Merck, Nissan, Pfizer, Red Bull and Toyota.

Our practice is comprised of experienced litigators who have defended cases on every level — from formulating and implementing national strategy in multijurisdictional litigation to conducting Daubert hearings and trials, as well as pursuing significant appeals. We have been lead defense counsel in a number of MDL proceedings, developed experts and conducted expert discovery, mapped strategies to obtain important early victories on substantive motions in key jurisdictions, coordinated discovery in thousands of actions, and prepared for and conducted precedent-setting trials. Skadden also has served as appellate counsel in landmark cases in many state and federal appellate courts and files amicus briefs in appeals that raise significant substantive law issues.

Additionally, we have been involved in numerous developments in class action law. For example, several attorneys in our group were instrumental in the passage of the Class Action Fairness Act, which expanded federal jurisdiction over class actions and prevents plaintiffs from “forum shopping” by filing their claims in state courts known to be plaintiff-friendly. We also regularly represent the Product Liability Advisory Council and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as amici in appeals involving important class action principles.

Our attorneys have been among the lead proponents of expanding the use and application of the “no injury” doctrine, which holds that a plaintiff fails to state a legally cognizable injury when he or she is merely seeking recovery for the alleged heightened risk of physical or economic injury. Also, we have developed and implemented the “class-wide proof” concept in scores of class actions, persuading federal and state court judges to deny certification because the plaintiffs could not properly try their claims on a class-wide basis. We have experience combating efforts to water down the “injury” and “causation” elements of many causes of action through the use of “presumed reliance” and “market fraud” arguments.

Skadden was named 2022 Washington, D.C. Litigation Department of the Year for Product Liability by The National Law Journal, 2021 Litigation Department of the Year by New York Law Journal and a finalist in the general litigation category of the New York Law Journal’s 2023 and 2022 Litigation Department of the Year compe­titions. We also were named a finalist in The American Lawyer’s 2021 Litigation Department of the Year competition and a finalist in the Products Liability category of the publication’s 2023 compe­tition. We were named among Law360’s Product Liability Groups of the Year for 2022. We ranked in the top tier for Mass Torts and Consumer Class Actions by Chambers USA 2023. In 2022, we were again named to the BTI Consulting Group’s list of top litigation law firms: The BTI Fearsome Foursome. BTI Litigation Outlook 2018 also noted Skadden as a Powerhouse in Product Liability Litigation and Class Actions. We ranked among the top firms for Products Liability & Benchmark Litigation 2022 and in the top tier for Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Defendants by U.S. News — Best Lawyers Best Law Firms.