Key Points
- With growth in the food and beverage sector coming primarily from premium and insurgent brands, legacy companies whose organic growth has stalled are looking to M&A to compensate. That is likely to drive more dealmaking in 2026.
- A bifurcation of the market, with some consumers opting for cheaper house brands while others move upmarket, has further strained companies with products in the middle.
- The Trump administration’s Make America Healthy Again initiative has focused public attention on the quality of ingredients and healthy foods, another factor that is likely to spur M&A in the sector in 2026.
__________
PepsiCo’s acquisition of the prebiotic soda line Poppi and Hershey’s acquisition of healthy snack maker LesserEvil reflect an ever-growing theme in the food and beverage space: premiumization.
Premiumization:
The act of highlighting quality ingredients or distinctive features to elevate a product’s status.
From “cleaner” ingredients and functional benefits to sustainable sourcing and value-aligned messaging, many shoppers are demanding more from the products they purchase and are willing to pay higher prices for. In 2024, global sales volumes for premium brands rose by 3%, while mainstream brand volumes declined by 1%, according to market research company Circana. Looking ahead, Circana’s forecast for 2026 projects industry price/mix gains between 2% and 4%, while volume sales are anticipated to be flat or slightly negative, underscoring the ongoing challenge for brands to drive organic growth.
The Stalling of Organic Growth for Legacy Companies
Despite efforts to drive sales through product line expansions, packaging innovations and social media marketing campaigns, CPG conglomerates’ revenue growth has plateaued, according to global consulting firm BCG.
While the food and beverage industry’s sales increased by 2.1% in 2024, sales for large players (those with over $1 billion in sales) grew just 0.5%, according to BCG. These stagnating sales are attributable not only to macroeconomic pressures such as continued inflation, but more fundamentally, to shifting customer behavior.
The consumer landscape has become increasingly bifurcated, with lower-income shoppers gravitating toward more affordable private label products and higher-income shoppers favoring premium offerings. At the same time, the market has seen the emergence of the “unscripted consumer”: someone willing to trade down on one grocery item and splurge on another.
Consequently, incumbent food brands are being challenged in both directions, losing market share to private labels on price and to premium products on quality.
The Rise of Insurgent Brands
The trend toward premiumization, including younger consumers demanding greater transparency from food and beverage companies, has fueled the rise of insurgent brands, according to management consulting firm Bain & Company.
Such products often use higher-quality ingredients and/or place an emphasis on brand awareness.
Insurgent brands:
Niche products, such as plant-based yogurt and chili-infused honey, that are generating $10 million to $25 million in annual revenue and growing more than 10 times their category’s average growth rate over the past five years.
These innovators are disrupting the industry and capturing an outsized share of its growth. Insurgent brands drove more than 27% of food sector growth in 2024 while representing less than 1% of market share. The nonalcoholic beverage category shows a similar pattern, with insurgent brands delivering 32% of growth despite comprising less than 3% of the market for that category.
Notably, insurgents have captured this disproportionate share of growth almost entirely through volume expansion, in contrast to legacy food and beverage companies, whose 2024 sales gains were attributable primarily to price increases.
Poising the Industry for Sustained M&A Activity
The growing focus on premiumization will create two key near-term tailwinds that are expected to help continue to fuel M&A activity:
- Incumbent CPG companies will continue their recent trend of acquiring premium food brands to help stimulate further growth. For companies that are not perceived as offering premium products, acquiring premium brands has been — and will likely continue to be — the most efficient path to capitalize on trends. In 2025 alone, Pepsi completed its $1.2 billion acquisition of Siete Foods, which is branded as a better-for-you Mexican American food brand, and its $1.95 billion acquisition of Poppi.
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s appointment as the Health and Human Services secretary and his focus on the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement has further increased the spotlight on the food supply chain and Americans’ eating habits. The regulatory push for healthier food products and ingredients will put additional pressure on legacy CPG companies to expand their offerings of products that both consumers and regulators view as healthy. Premium products in the better-for-you category are perfectly positioned to benefit from M&A activity.
What We’re Watching
While tariff uncertainty muted food and beverage M&A activity for much of 2025, we believe that the forces impacting the food industry will help propel M&A activity in 2026. Shifting consumer tastes, a wealth of insurgent brands and increased regulatory scrutiny all provide the conditions for robust food and beverage dealmaking.
Read more about M&A:
- M&A in the AI Era: What Buyers Can Do to Confirm and Protect Value
- The Long-Anticipated Wave of Bank Consolidation Starts to Break
- M&A in the Middle East: AI, Financial Services and Energy Transition Lead the New Wave
- Boards Face Continued Pressure to Pursue Spin-Offs as Investors Seek Corporate Clarity and Value Creation
- Liability Divestiture Transactions: A Win-Win for Financial Buyers and Mass Tort Defendants
- Political Law Due Diligence in M&A Transactions Is Increasingly Critical
See the full 2026 Insights publication
This memorandum is provided by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and its affiliates for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This memorandum is considered advertising under applicable state laws.