Key Points
- Carve-outs and divestitures have become common for multinationals with businesses in China and Southeast Asia as boards reassess portfolio composition against a backdrop of regulatory change, geopolitical exposure and shifting capital allocation priorities.
- In China and Southeast Asia, local requirements (including foreign-ownership restrictions, data localization rules and indirect transfer tax regimes) can affect which transaction structures are available and which counterparties are viable. These considerations can emerge as issues earlier than deal teams expect.
- As carve-out activity in the region continues to grow, deal teams are increasingly treating regulatory strategy, data mapping and post-closing separation planning as front-end priorities rather than later-stage exercises.
__________
Carve-outs and divestitures have moved to the center of the Asia Pacific M&A agenda. For multinationals, Asia remains central to growth and supply chain strategies, but many multinational boards are increasingly concluding that regional businesses are better owned by local champions or financial sponsors.
In China, groups are reassessing local operations against evolving regulatory expectations, data and technology rules, sanctions risk and intensifying domestic competition. Across Southeast Asia, portfolio adjustment has primarily been driven by macroeconomic pressures and a desire to redeploy capital into higher-growth segments such as technology and energy transition.
Presigning Considerations
Structuring the Transfer
Most carve-outs begin with perimeter definition — identifying the assets, licenses, contracts, employees and data required for the business to operate on a stand-alone basis. In China and much of Southeast Asia, asset transfers involve extensive procedural steps (third-party consents, regulatory re-registrations, license transfers and tax filings) that complicate execution.
Share transfers are mechanically simpler but import historic liabilities and are not always available in restricted sectors. Foreign-ownership thresholds and sectoral licensing requirements can mandate alternative structures (e.g., joint ventures, contractual arrangements or licensing agreements), which must be assessed against local enforcement risk.
Regional businesses are frequently held through multitiered onshore and offshore structures (e.g., variable interest entities) designed to address foreign-ownership restrictions or for tax and regulatory reasons. The location and design of these structures influences deal architecture, treaty-benefit access and upstream/downstream cash flow planning.
Several jurisdictions, including China and Indonesia, have rules intended to capture gains on disposals of offshore entities whose value derives primarily from onshore assets. Direct and indirect tax exposure should therefore be assessed early.
Foreign Exchange and Local Incentives
Foreign-exchange controls are common across the region and can affect deal economics, settlement currency, repatriation of proceeds, and the structuring of escrow and deferred consideration.
In parallel, many jurisdictions offer tax incentives, subsidies and land grants subject to conditions linked to investment size, employment or profit reinvestment. A divestiture or change of control may trigger a termination or clawback of those benefits, particularly where local authority discretion is involved.
Early diligence should focus on how incentives were obtained, what conditions apply and whether price adjustments or escrow mechanisms are needed. Even where incentives may as a legal matter be eligible to continue, local authorities may use the transaction as an opportunity to extract commitments or other value from a buyer.
Data Transfer Restrictions and Diligence Arrangements
China’s data and cybersecurity framework imposes restrictions on cross-border transfers of personal information and “important data,” with applicable mechanisms determined by the nature and volume of data involved. Across Southeast Asia, several jurisdictions have adopted comprehensive privacy laws with cross-border data transfer restrictions and localization requirements, though these are not uniform and require jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction analysis.
Mapping data flows should be undertaken early in carve-out planning to determine which data must remain onshore. During due diligence, “clean room” arrangements, data aggregation or redaction, or other access controls may be required where the target holds sensitive personal data or operationally critical datasets.
Sign-to-Close Considerations
Regulatory Approvals
Carve-outs in the region may trigger:
- Foreign investment restrictions.
- Sector-specific approvals.
- Merger control filings.
- Foreign-exchange control filings.
The two regulatory issues most likely to drive timing and feasibility are foreign-ownership restrictions (enforced through sector-specific negative lists) and merger control, particularly in sectors regarded as strategically important.
A multinational’s home-state regimes (e.g., U.S. export controls and sanctions, or foreign investment review frameworks in the U.S., European countries or U.K.) may further constrain counterparty selection, limit transferable technology and data, and affect deal structure.
Transaction documents therefore increasingly include detailed regulatory risk-allocation provisions:
- Extensive efforts standards, including “hell or high water” provisions.
- Cooperation and information-sharing mechanisms.
- Commitments to offer undertakings to regulators.
- Tailored termination rights.
- Reverse termination fees for failure to obtain regulatory clearance.
Where both local and home-state regimes apply, parties must coordinate filings to ensure consistency, manage divergent timelines and sequence approvals to support deal certainty.
Employment and Workforce Transition
Unlike jurisdictions with statutory automatic transfer laws (e.g., the U.K. and parts of Europe), most jurisdictions in China and Southeast Asia require employee transfers to be individually managed, which means assessing:
- Whether employee consents are needed.
- Whether change of control or changes to terms trigger severance obligations.
- How benefits and seniority will be honored.
This can be a significant source of execution risk, particularly for large manufacturing or services workforces. In many Asian jurisdictions, including China, India and Indonesia, local governments place significant weight on employment stability, and transactions perceived to threaten headcount can attract scrutiny, industrial action and negative publicity. Buyer communications to the workforce about post-closing plans should be carefully calibrated as part of transaction planning.
Post-Closing Considerations
Transitional Services Agreements
As in other regions, carved-out businesses in Asia are frequently integrated into the seller’s global systems and supply chains. Transitional arrangements bridge the period in which the buyer builds stand-alone capabilities and must be calibrated to local regulatory requirements — particularly around data localization, licensing and restrictions on cross-border service provision — as well as practical considerations including language, time zone coverage and local support infrastructure.
Longer-Term Commercial Arrangements
Longer-term interdependencies often persist through supply, manufacturing, distribution, brand-licensing and technology-sharing arrangements. These are typically negotiated alongside the main transaction documents and must be coordinated with competition law, tax (including transfer pricing) and regulatory considerations, given their direct impact on valuation and risk allocation.
This memorandum is provided by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and its affiliates for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This memorandum is considered advertising under applicable state laws.